From d88bc2baeb628326927811dedfce88a955e41f34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aryadev Chavali Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:04:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] alisp.org: mark some TODOs --- alisp.org | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/alisp.org b/alisp.org index c8931c8..ad3377b 100644 --- a/alisp.org +++ b/alisp.org @@ -45,11 +45,13 @@ i.e. no parsing. *** DONE Design what a "parser function" would look like The general function is something like ~stream -> T | Err~. What other state do we need to encode? -*** TODO Write a parser for integers -*** TODO Write a parser for symbols -*** TODO Write a parser for lists +*** WIP Write a parser for integers +*** DONE Write a parser for symbols +*** DONE Write a parser for lists +*** TODO Write a parser for strings +Requires [[*Design Strings for the Lisp]] to be complete first. *** TODO Write a parser for vectors -*** TODO Write the general parser +*** WIP Write the general parser ** Unit tests :tests: *** TODO Test streams **** DONE Test file init @@ -109,12 +111,12 @@ Super obvious. *** TODO Design Strings for the Lisp :api: We have ~sv_t~ so our basic C API is done. We just need pluggable functions to construct and deconstruct strings as lisps. -** Backlog +** Design :design: *** TODO Design Big Integers :api: We currently have 62 bit integers implemented via immediate values embedded in a pointer. We need to be able to support even _bigger_ integers. How do we do this? -*** TODO Design garbage collection scheme :design:gc: +*** TODO Design garbage collection scheme :gc: Really, regardless of what I do, we need to have some kind of garbage collection header on whatever managed objects we allocate.