Better checking of opcode types
Introduced an enum (opcode_type_t) for the masks and values of each opcode, which allows defining a single enum which checks an opcode by a opcode_type_t.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -23,26 +23,26 @@ void vm_execute(vm_t *vm)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
inst_t instruction = prog->instructions[prog->ptr];
|
||||
|
||||
if (OPCODE_IS_PUSH(instruction.opcode))
|
||||
if (OPCODE_IS_TYPE(instruction.opcode, OP_TYPE_PUSH))
|
||||
{
|
||||
PUSH_ROUTINES[instruction.opcode](vm, instruction.operand);
|
||||
vm->registers.ret = instruction.operand.as_word;
|
||||
prog->ptr++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (OPCODE_IS_PUSH_REG(instruction.opcode))
|
||||
else if (OPCODE_IS_TYPE(instruction.opcode, OP_TYPE_PUSH_REGISTER))
|
||||
{
|
||||
PUSH_REG_ROUTINES[instruction.opcode](vm, instruction.reg);
|
||||
vm->registers.ret = instruction.operand.as_word;
|
||||
prog->ptr++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (OPCODE_IS_POP(instruction.opcode))
|
||||
else if (OPCODE_IS_TYPE(instruction.opcode, OP_TYPE_POP))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// NOTE: We use the `ret` register for the result of this pop
|
||||
data_t d = POP_ROUTINES[instruction.opcode](vm);
|
||||
vm->registers.ret = d.as_word;
|
||||
prog->ptr++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (OPCODE_IS_MOV(instruction.opcode))
|
||||
else if (OPCODE_IS_TYPE(instruction.opcode, OP_TYPE_MOV))
|
||||
{
|
||||
MOV_ROUTINES[instruction.opcode](vm, instruction.operand, instruction.reg);
|
||||
vm->registers.ret = instruction.operand.as_word;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user