| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Need to fix what's going on with the example in main.c using stdin.
|
|
If it isn't a CONS, we return NIL instead of failing. This way, we
can use it in our general iteration functions. Eventually the actual
runtime would use this as well. The macros are mostly for internal
use to do assignment etc.
|
|
|
|
Avoid 2 levels of indirection, and having to allocate twice for small
payloads, by having an inlined array on the vector directly!
Beautiful and simple.
Required a bit of refactoring around the board, but overall the result
makes me feel happier.
|
|
bit nicer to look at, should have about the same painful performance
hit anyway.
|
|
Stable vectors will be used in the lisp runtime to implement actual
vectors, instead of using the disgusting lvec trick. This way we at
least can get attributes about the vector through one pointer hop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to implement a normal stable vector instead of an inline
vector so we have both options for use. I think that's smarter than
just sticking to one.
|
|
We're storing them as sv_t's anyway, we're fucked with regards to
indirection. Thus, let's be nice to ourselves, and deal with the
structures. We get the size of the structure for free anyway!
|
|
Makes more sense when you think about including it as an external
library
|
